On November 21st, we met at the office of Ikos Consulting in Levallois-Perret. In the presence of the creators, the designers, and the users of the language, we agreed about future enhancement processes and started the process to precisely define the next version of the HLL language definition.
The next steps will be to concretely agree about the precise definition of the next version of the HLL language, the features to be added having already been decided. We also have a few details to sort out about the legal structure of the HLL Forum.
Prover would like to thank all participants for their proposals and comments about how to organize the HLL Forum in the future.
Prover is also particularly grateful to IKOS Consulting who welcomed us in the best conditions to a serene and efficient day.
Share this article
Learn to build a solid safety case for rail control systems using formal verification
Fill out your information here.
More News & Articles
Prover, together with NEAT, Schneider Electric, and Pilz will demo real railway interoperability at InnoTrans: three vendor platforms, one interlocking design, live at Prover's booth.
EULYNX standardizes rail signaling interfaces, but not the assurance behind them. Here's how formal methods close that gap, with exhaustive proof, generated test suites, and verified wrappers.
AI makes formal verification more important, not less. See why AI-assisted engineering needs mathematical proof, not just testing, to stay safety-critical.
