On November 21st, we met at the office of Ikos Consulting in Levallois-Perret. In the presence of the creators, the designers, and the users of the language, we agreed about future enhancement processes and started the process to precisely define the next version of the HLL language definition.
The next steps will be to concretely agree about the precise definition of the next version of the HLL language, the features to be added having already been decided. We also have a few details to sort out about the legal structure of the HLL Forum.
Prover would like to thank all participants for their proposals and comments about how to organize the HLL Forum in the future.
Prover is also particularly grateful to IKOS Consulting who welcomed us in the best conditions to a serene and efficient day.
Share this article
Learn to build a solid safety case for rail control systems using formal verification
Fill out your information here.
More News & Articles
When replacing relay interlockings, most conversations start with technology. The better starting point is governance: how do you make sure you can still change parts of the system 20 years from now? We look at what Open Signaling means in practice, and how our Stockholm Metro pilot was designed for replaceability from day one.
Prover, RATP and Systerel publish the unified HLL 4.0 specification, keeping the rail industry's formal verification language open and free of dialects.
Generative AI has entered railway software engineering ahead of the standards governing it. A new CENELEC draft amendment to EN 50716 doesn't add requirements. It clarifies which existing rules apply when AI drafts specs, writes code, or generates test cases, and why those rules are harder to satisfy with generative models than teams might assume.
+46 (0)8 617 68 00